| Sažetak | Feminizam kao pokret iz 18. stoljeća kojim su žene prema Maskalan (2015) zalagale za ulazak žena u društveni i politički život kojim su do tada dominirali isključivo muškarci, imao je veliki utjecaj na promjenu društva. Feminizam je kroz četiri vala nastojao pokoriti duboko ukorijenjene socijalne norme i svladati diskriminaciju žena u društvu, što je u modrenom dobu znatno olakšano, ali i u određenoj mjeri ostvareno. Feminizma je također otvorio pitanje poimanje čovjeka, njegova života, uloge u društvu, obitelji i odgoja. Proučavanjem feminizma i odgoja moguće je uočiti njihovu međusobnu povezanost, kao i njihovu povezanost sa filozofijom. Filozofija odgoja koja se bavi pitanjem „zašto odgajati?“ i feminizam kao pokret za jednakost žena znatno su promijenili strukturu društva i u pitanje doveli brojne obrasce ponašanja i norme koja su bila duboko ukorijenjena u društvu. (Polić, 2003).
Cilj ovog rada je povezati utjecaj feminizma sa ulogom očeva u odgoju, zašto je ona prije bila samo u svrhu zaštite i materijalne opskrbe obitelji, a danas se očevi nastoje ravnopravno uključiti u odgoj. Mogući odgovor leži u otkrivanju ideologije patrijarhalnosti, propitivanju spola i roda što dovodi do propitivanju muško-ženskih uloga koje dovode do pomicanja spolnih granica i preraspodjelu društvenih uloga. (Polić, 2006)
Iako se očinstvo i dalje zbog tradicionalnog, patrijarhalnog, uređenja društva i skretanja feminizma sa puta borbe protiv spolne diskriminacije u mizandriju, odnosno mržnju žena prema muškarcima i dalje ne cijeni dovoljno, osjeti se znatno poboljšanje koje svoje rješenje pronalazi u uvođenje programa za pružanje podrške očevima za ravnopravno sudjelovanje u roditeljstvu i poticanju njihovih kompetencija što će doprinijeti dugo očekivanoj raspodijeli obaveza i odgovornosti u kućanstvu i odgoju, ali i „razrješavanju problema neravnopravnosti spolova, nasilja u obitelji, netolerancije i nedemokratskog ponašanja u obitelji.“ (Sirali i Čzmen, 2012, str. 9) , ali i društvu općenito. |
| Sažetak (engleski) | The influence of feminism on the understading of the role of fathers in the education - the context of the philosophy of education
Feminism as an 18th-century movement that, according to Maskalan (2015), advocated for the entry of women into social and political life dominated by men until then, had a major impact society. Through four waves, feminism try to subdue deep-rooted social norms and overcome discrimination against women in society, which was greatly facilitated in the modern age, but also to some extent achieved. Feminism also opened the question of the notion of man, his life, role in society, family and upbringing. By studying feminism and upbringing, it is possible to notice their interconnectedness, as well as their connection with philosophy. The philosophy of education that deals with the question "why educate?" and feminism as a movement for women's equality have significantly changed the structure of society and called into question numerous patterns of behavior and norms that were deeply rooted in society. (Polić, 2003).
The aim of this paper is to connect the influence of feminism with the role of fathers in education, why it used to be only for the purpose of protection and material support of the family, and today fathers strive to be equally involved in education. A possible answer lies in discovering the ideology of patriarchy, questioning gender and sex that leads to questioning male-female roles that lead to shifting gender boundaries and redistribution of social roles. (Polić, 2006)
Although fatherhood remains due to traditional, patriarchal, social planning and the divergence of feminism from the path to fighting sexual discrimination in misandria, that is, the hatred of women towards men is still not appreciated enough, the significant improvement it finds in the introduction of programs to support fathers for equal participation in parenting and the encouragement of their competences which will contribute to the long-awaited distribution of obligations and responsibilities in the household and education, as well as the “resolution of problems of gender inequality, violence and intolerance in the family.” (Sirali i Čzmen, 2012, p. 9), but also to society in general. |
